Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep ; 11: 23247096231176216, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2323814

ABSTRACT

With the previous worldwide initial coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, a notable rise in spontaneous pneumomediastinum with/without pneumothorax (SPP) has been noted. Most cases were initially reported as complications secondary to barotrauma from mechanical ventilation (MV) with COVID-19. However, with the Delta strain, starting from December 2020, there have been multiple reports of SPP. The SPP is an uncommon complication outside use of assisted ventilation with either noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) or MV. COVID-19 has been linked to higher incidence of SPP without use of NIPPV or MV. We present a series of 5 cases with a polymerase chain reaction-confirmed COVID-19 diagnostic testing whose hospital course was complicated by SPP unrelated to the use of either NIPPV or MV.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mediastinal Emphysema , Pneumothorax , Humans , COVID-19 Testing , Respiration, Artificial
2.
Cureus ; 15(1): e34098, 2023 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2285216

ABSTRACT

The clinical manifestations of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) are widespread, ranging from asymptomatic to critical illness with significant morbidity and mortality. It is widely known that individuals who have viral respiratory infections are more likely to develop bacterial infections. Throughout the pandemic, despite the fact that COVID-19 was thought to be the primary cause of millions of deaths, bacterial coinfections, superinfections, and other secondary complications played a significant role in the increased mortality rate. In our case, a 76-year-old male presented to the hospital complaining of shortness of air. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing was positive for COVID-19 and cavitary lesions were discovered on imaging. Treatment was guided based on the results of bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) cultures showing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Mycobacterium gordonae. However, the case was later complicated by the development of a pulmonary embolism after anticoagulants were held due to new onset hemoptysis. Our case highlights the importance of considering bacterial coinfection in cavitary lung lesions, appropriate antimicrobial stewardship, and close follow-up for full recovery in COVID-19 infections.

3.
J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep ; 10: 23247096221129925, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2064705

ABSTRACT

The Delta variant of COVID-19 has been associated with severe disease causing a surge in the second half of 2021. Atypical pathogens can be present in those in particular with severe ARDS and can contribute to excess morbidity and mortality. We must maintain a high level of suspicion for these pathogens as this can present an opportunity to dramatically improve the prognosis of a patient with COVID-19 ARDS. However, lend caution to Mycoplasma IgM serology as this can be a false-positive. If suspicion remains high for Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection, sputum polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for M pneumoniae is the gold standard for diagnosis. We present the case of a 42-year-old female with COVID-19 Delta variant presumed ARDS who had co-infection with M pneumoniae confirmed by endotracheal sputum aspirate PCR with rapidly improving oxygenation and extubation within 4 days of effective antibiotic therapy.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coinfection , Pneumonia, Mycoplasma , Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19/diagnosis , Coinfection/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Immunoglobulin M , Mycoplasma pneumoniae , Pneumonia, Mycoplasma/complications , Pneumonia, Mycoplasma/diagnosis , SARS-CoV-2
4.
Cureus ; 14(7): e26555, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1979632

ABSTRACT

The cytokine storm associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) triggers a hypercoagulable state leading to venous and arterial thromboembolism. Lab findings associated with this phenomenon are elevated D-dimer, fibrinogen, C-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin, and procalcitonin. We present the case of a 66-year-old male with dyslipidemia who was diagnosed with COVID-19 with worsening shortness of breath, myalgia, and loss of taste. Physical examination was remarkable for crackles with diminished lung sounds and use of his accessory muscles. Labs showed normal white blood cell count, D-dimer of 1.42 mg/L, ferritin of 961 ng/mL, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) of 621 U/L, and CRP of 2.1 mg/dL. Chest X-ray showed atypical pneumonitis with patchy abnormalities. He required oxygen supplementation with fraction of inspired oxygen of 100% proning as tolerated. He received remdesivir, ceftriaxone, azithromycin, dexamethasone, prophylactic enoxaparin, and a unit of plasma therapy. His D-dimer had increased from 1.65 to 3.51 mg/L with worsening dyspnea. At this time, computed tomography angiogram (CTA) of the chest showed extensive ground-glass opacities and a 2.4 × 1.9 × 1.3 cm distal thoracic aortic intraluminal thrombus. He was started on a heparin drip. A follow-up CTA of the aorta showed thrombus or hypoattenuation within the splenic artery and wedge-shaped areas extending from the hilum with possible infarction and a 6 mm thrombus in the infrarenal abdominal aorta. He was transitioned to enoxaparin 1 mg/kg twice daily. He remained asymptomatic from his splenic infarction. This case adds more insight to splenic infarction associated with COVID-19 in addition to the 32 reported cases documented thus far. Management of thromboembolism includes a therapeutic dose of anticoagulation. To prevent thromboembolism, prophylactic anticoagulation is recommended for those hospitalized with COVID-19.

5.
J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep ; 10: 23247096211063332, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1603889

ABSTRACT

We present the case of a 56-year-old woman who was diagnosed with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia complicated by severe acute respiratory distress syndrome who was intubated for 19 days. She recovered from COVID-19 after a month. A computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest, after a month, showed improved infiltrates with a small residual cavity within the lingula. A CT angiogram showed a more confluent density in the lingular portion on follow-up 2 months later. She developed intermittent hemoptysis after 3 months in December 2020, which persisted for almost 6 months, and CT of the chest showed the lingular nodular with resolution of the cavitation. She underwent bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage, confirming Aspergillus fumigatus by galactomannan assay and histology showing branching hyphae. Once she started treatment with itraconazole, her hemoptysis resolved. The follow-up CT of the chest after 2 months of treatment did not show a cavity or a nodule in the lingula. Our patient developed invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) as a sequela of severe COVID-19 infection. COVID-19-associated invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) is an underrecognized complication that needs to be investigated on whether prophylactic treatment is required. Our case also demonstrates that the diagnosis of IPA needs to be considered months after COVID-19 infection when a superimposed fungal infection can occur after a viral infection if the patient continues to have persistent symptoms.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis , Pulmonary Aspergillosis , Aspergillus fumigatus , Female , Humans , Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis/complications , Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis/diagnosis , Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis/drug therapy , Middle Aged , Pulmonary Aspergillosis/complications , Pulmonary Aspergillosis/drug therapy , SARS-CoV-2
6.
Cureus ; 13(8): e16842, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1405533

ABSTRACT

Introduction The success of a vaccination program is dependent on vaccine efficacy and the number of people vaccinated. Healthcare workers are the first to receive the COVID-19 vaccine based on CDC phase 1a recommendations and are a point of contact for information for patients, so they must be well-educated on common misconceptions about the vaccine. Objective To identify acceptance/refusal rates of COVID-19 vaccine, reasons for refusal, and to understand the impact of demographics, work environment, and comorbidities on vaccine acceptance. Methods A cross-sectional study of 1076 healthcare employees in Rural Appalachian utilizing electronic and paper-based 12 question surveys from December 10, 2020, through December 20, 2020, followed up to April 2021. Results Within our study, 52.3% of our healthcare workers would accept vaccination with higher age, male gender, physicians, and those who receive annual flu vaccines more likely to accept vaccination. The most common reason for refusal was unknown side effects (88.5%). The second reason for refusal at 33.5% was waiting for someone else to take the vaccine first. In February 2021, the percentage of our healthcare workers who were vaccinated was 48%, which then increased to 55% in March 2021. By April 2021, the vaccination percentage of our healthcare workers reached 59%. Conclusions In order to predict how the public percentage of vaccination would be, healthcare workers need to address concerns about side effects from the vaccines and encourage the public to get the vaccines since healthcare workers themselves had already received the vaccines and can educate the patients on how they did after getting the shots.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL